Society for Pure English, Tract 02 - On English Homophones by Robert Seymour Bridges;Society for Pure English
page 47 of 94 (50%)
page 47 of 94 (50%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
_K._ What comfort man? How is't with aged Gaunt?
_G._ O, how that name befits my composition! Old Gaunt indeed, and gaunt in being old, &c. where, as he explains, Misery makes sport to mock itself. This is a humorous indulgence of fancy, led on by the associations of a word; a pun is led off by the _sound_ of a word in pursuit of nonsense; though the variety of its ingenuity may refuse so simple a definition. [Sidenote: An indirect advantage of homophones.] It is true that a real good may sometimes come indirectly from a word being a homophone, because its inconvenience in common parlance may help to drive it into a corner where it can be retained for a special signification: and since the special significance of any word is its first merit, and the coinage of new words for special differentiation is difficult and rare, we may rightly welcome any fortuitous means for their provision. Examples of words specialized thus from homophones are _brief_ (a lawyer's brief), _hose_ (water-pipe), _bolt_ (of door), _mail_ (postal), _poll_ (election), &c.[11] [Footnote 11: It would follow that, supposing there were any expert academic control, it might be possible to save some of our perishing homophones by artificial specialization. Such words are needed, and if a homophone were thus specialized in some department of life or |
|