Ulster's Stand For Union by Ronald John McNeill
page 92 of 394 (23%)
page 92 of 394 (23%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
[20] See Interview with Mr. F.W. Warden in _The Standard_, February 8th,
1912. [21] See Dublin Correspondent's telegram in _The Times_, January 29th, 1912. CHAPTER VII "WHAT ANSWER FROM THE NORTH?" Public curiosity as to the proposals that the coming Home Rule Bill might contain was not set at rest by Mr. Churchill's oration in Belfast. The constitution-mongers were hard at work with suggestions. Attempts were made to conciliate hesitating opinion by representing Irish Home Rule as a step in the direction of a general federal system for the United Kingdom, and by tracing an analogy with the constitutions already granted to the self-governing Dominions. Closely connected with the federal idea was the question of finance. There was lively speculation as to what measure of control over taxation the Bill would confer on the Irish Parliament, and especially whether it would be given the power to impose duties of Customs and Excise. Home Rulers themselves were sharply divided on the question. At a conference held at the London School of Economics on the 10th of January, 1912, Professor T.M. Kettle, Mr. Erskine Childers, and Mr. Thomas Lough, M.P., declared themselves in favour of Irish fiscal autonomy, while Lord Macdonnell opposed the idea as irreconcilable with the fiscal policy of Great Britain.[22] The |
|