Purcell by John F. Runciman
page 8 of 55 (14%)
page 8 of 55 (14%)
|
respects:
1. _Form and Structure_.--Nearly all the important old music, the music that counts, was for voices--for chorus--with or without accompaniment. "Forms," in the modern sense of the word--cyclical forms with recurring themes arranged in regular sequence, and with development passages, etc.--of these there were none. Some composers were groping blindly after a something they wanted, but they did not hit on it. Self-sustaining musical structures, independent of words, were poor and flimsy. The form of the music that matters was determined by the words. From beginning to end of each composition voice followed voice, one singing, higher or lower, what had been sung by the others, while those others added melodies that made correct harmony. Thus a web of music was spun which has to be listened to, so to speak, horizontally and vertically--horizontally for the melodies that are sung simultaneously, and vertically for the chords that are produced by the sounding together of the notes of those melodies. When the words were used up the composition came to an end. Often the words were repeated, and repeated often; but there should be reason in all things, and the finest composers stopped when they had finished. The tendency in the new music was to abandon the horizontal aspect. Purcell, in his additions to Playford's "Brief Introduction to the Skill of Musick," remarks on the fact that musicians now composed "to the treble, when they make counterpoint or basses to tunes or songs." Music became, broadly speaking, tunes with an accompaniment. The fugue was no contradiction of this. Even in its heyday, though the parts were ever so independent of one another, the mass of tone forms a great melody, or _melos_, moving on a firm harmonic foundation in the lowest part. The great choral fugues of Bach and Handel have often in the |
|