Aeroplanes by James Slough Zerbe
page 62 of 239 (25%)
page 62 of 239 (25%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
impossible to prevent a machine from coming
down, it can be prevented from overturning, and this can be done without in the least detracting from it structurally. _Fig. 16. Reversing Motion._ The plan suggested has one great fault, however. It will be impossible with such a structure to cause it to fly upside down. It does not present any means whereby dare-devil stunts can be performed to edify the grandstand. In this respect it is not in the same class with the present types. THE STARTING MOVEMENT.--Examine this plan from the position of starting, and see the advantages it possesses. In these illustrations we have used, for convenience only, the monoplane type, and it is obvious that the same remarks apply to the bi-plane. Fig. 17 shows the starting position of the stock monoplane, in position 1, while it is being initially run over the ground, preparatory to launching. Position 2 represents the negative angle at which the tail is thrown, which movement depresses the rear end of the frame and thus gives the supporting planes the proper angle to raise the machine, through a positive angle of incidence, of the plane. |
|