Punch, Or The London Charivari, Volume 102, March 5, 1892 by Various
page 34 of 37 (91%)
page 34 of 37 (91%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
notice if war were declared?
_P.R._ (_surprised_). Certainly! Why not? "Peace with Honour" would be my motto. As to pay, of course you know what I could get if I went in for civil employment? _Sergeant K._ No, I don't, and I don't see what that has to do with it. You surely would not compare the QUEEN'S service with the work of a beggarly counter-jumper? _P.R._ Yes, I would. And as I could earn five shillings a-day easily in a shop, why, you will have to give me that, with a pension (as I might do better) of ten shillings a-day after six years' service. _Sergeant K._ Any other point you would like to mention? _P.R._ Yes, there is one other. Why should a labourer be able to get damages from his employer when injured, and a soldier be unable? The principle of the Employers' Liability Act must be extended to the Army, so that if any Commanding Officer made some stupid blunder in battle, as he probably would do, and I were to be hurt in consequence, I might sue him when we got back to England. You understand my point? _Sergeant K._ Oh, quite! But what would there be to prevent every soldier present at the battle from suing also? _P.R._ Nothing at all. Of course they _would_ all sue. So no General must be permitted to go into action without first of all depositing in the High Court at home security for costs if defeated,--say half a million or so. |
|