De Carmine Pastorali (1684) by René Rapin
page 35 of 69 (50%)
page 35 of 69 (50%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
themselves are rude and unpolisht: And this proves that they
scandalously err, who make their Shepherds appear polite and elegant; nor can I imagine what _Veratus_ {33} who makes so much ado about the polite manners of the _Arcadian_ Shepherds, would say to _Polybius_ who tells us that _Arcadians_ by reason of the Mountainousness of the Country and hardness of the weather, are very unsociable and austere. Now as too much neatness in _Pastoral_ is not to be allow'd, so rusticity (I do not mean that which _Plato_, in his Third Book of a Commonwealth, mentions which is but a part of a down right honesty) but Clownish stupidity, such as _Theophrastus_, in his Character of a _Rustick_, describes; or that disagreeable unfashionable roughness which _Horace_ mentions in his Epistle to _Lollius_, must not in my opinion be endur'd: On this side _Mantuan_ errs extreamly, and is intolerably absur'd, who makes Shepherds blockishly sottish, and insufferably rude: And a certain Interpreter blames _Theocritus_ for the same thing, who in some mens opinion sometimes keeps too close to the _Clown_, and is rustick and uncouth; But this may be very well excus'd because the Age in which he sang was not as polite as now. But that every Part may be suitable to a Shepherd, we must consult unstain'd, uncorrupted Nature; so that the manners might not be too Clownish nor too Caurtly: And this mean may be easily observed if the manners of our Shepherds be represented according to the _Genius_ of the _golden Age_, in which, if _Guarinus_ may be believ'd {34}, every man follow'd that employment: And _Nannius_ in the Preface to his Comments on _Virgil's_ _Bucolicks_ is of the same opinion, for he requires that the manners might represent the Golden Age: and this was the reason that _Virgil_ himself in his _Pollio_ describes that Age, which he knew very well was proper to _Bucolicks_: For in the whole |
|