Experiments and Considerations Touching Colours (1664) by Robert Boyle
page 14 of 285 (04%)
page 14 of 285 (04%)
|
with some Instances_ (55, 56.) _Next by removing those Bodies, which before
hindred the appearance of the Genuine Colour, confirm'd by several examples_ (57) _Thirdly, by making a Fissure or Separation either in the Contiguous or Continued Particles of a Body_ (58.) _Fourthly, by a Union or Conjunction of the formerly separated Particles; Illustrated with divers Instances of precipitated Bodies_ (59.) _Fifthly, by Dislocating the parts, and putting them both into other Orders and Postures, which is Illustrated with Instances_ (60, 61.) _Sixthly, by Motion, which is explain'd_ (62.) _And lastly, and chiefly, by the Union of the Saline Bodies, with the Superficial parts of another Body, whereby both their Bigness and Shape must necessarily be alter'd_ (63, 64.) _Explain'd by Experiments_ (65, 66.) _That the Colour of Bodies may be Chang'd by the concurrence of two or more of these ways_ (67.) _And besides all these, Eight Reflective causes of Colours, there may be in Transparent Bodies several Refractive_ (68, 69) _Why the Author thinks the Nature of Colours deserves yet a further Inquiry_ (69.) _First for that the little Motes of Dust exhibited very lovely Colours in a darkned Room, whilst in a convenient posture to the Eye, which in other Postures and Lights they did not_ (70.) _And that though the smaller Parts of some Colour'd Bodies are Transparent, yet of others they are not, so that the first Doubt's, whether the Superficial parts create those Colours, and the second, whether there be any Refraction at all in the later_ (71, 72, 73.) _A famous Controversie among Philosophers, about the Nature of Colour decided_. (74. 75.) Chap. 4. _The controversie stated about Real and Emphatical Colours_ (75, 76.) _That the great Disparity between them seems to be, partly their Duration in the same state, and partly, that Genuine Colours are produc'd in Opacous Bodies by Reflection, and Emphatical in Transparent by Refraction_ (78.) _but that this is not to be taken in too large a Sense, the Cautionary instance of Froth is alleged and insisted on_ (78, 79.) |
|