Experiments and Considerations Touching Colours (1664) by Robert Boyle
page 84 of 285 (29%)
page 84 of 285 (29%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
1. Though after what I have acknowledged, _Pyrophilus_, of the Abstruse Nature of Colours in _particular_, you will easily believe, that I pretend not to give you a Satisfactory account of Whiteness and Blackness; Yet not wholly to frustrate your Expectation of my offering something by way of Specimen towards the Explication of some Colours in particular, I shall make choice of These as the most Simple Ones, (and by reason of their mutual Opposition the Least hardly explicable) about which to present you my Thoughts, upon condition you will take them at most to be my Conjectures, not my Opinions. 2. When I apply'd my Self to consider, how the cause of Whiteness might be explan'd by Intelligible and Mechanical Principles, I remembred not to have met with any thing among the Antient _Corpuscularian_ Philosophers, touching the Quality we call Whiteness, save that _Democritus_ is by _Aristotle_ said to have ascrib'd the Whiteness of Bodies to their Smoothness, and on the contrary their Blackness to their Asperity.[6] But though about the Latter of those Qualities his Opinion be allowable, as we shall see anon, yet that he heeds a Favourable Interpretation in what is Deliver'd concerning the First, (at least if his Doctrine be not Mis-represented in this point, as it has been in many others) we shall quickly have Occasion to manifest. But amongst the _Moderns_, the most Learned _Gassendus_ in his Ingenious Epistle publish'd in the Year 1642. _De apparente Magnitudine solis humilis & sublimis_, reviving the _Atomical_ Philosophy, has, though but Incidentally, deliver'd something towards the Explication of Whiteness upon Mechanical Principles: And because no Man that I know of, has done so before him, I shall, to be sure to do him Right, give you his Sense in his own Words:[7] _Cogites velim_ (says he) _lucem quidem in Diaphano nullius coloris videri, sed in Opaco tamen terminante Candicare, ac tantò magis, quantò densior seu collectior |
|