The Development of the European Nations, 1870-1914 (5th ed.) by John Holland Rose
page 54 of 778 (06%)
page 54 of 778 (06%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
[Footnote 19: For the relations of France to the Vatican, see _Histoire du second Empire_, by M. De la Gorce, vol. vi. (Paris, 1903); also _Histoire Contemporaine_ (_i.e._ of France in 1869-1875), by M. Samuel Denis, 4 vols. The Empress Eugénie once said that she was "deux fois Catholique," as a Spaniard and as French Empress. (Sir M.K. Grant Duff, _Notes from a Diary, 1851-1872_, vol. i. p. 125.)] Even this brief survey of international relations shows that Napoleon III. was a source of weakness to France. Having seized on power by perfidious means, he throughout his whole reign strove to dazzle the French by a series of adventures, which indeed pleased the Parisians for the time, but at the cost of lasting distrust among the Powers. Generous in his aims, he at first befriended the German and Italian national movements, but forfeited all the fruits of those actions by his pettifogging conduct about Savoy and Nice, the Rhineland and Belgium; while his final efforts to please French clericals and Chauvinists[20] by supporting the Pope at Rome, lost him the support of States that might have retrieved the earlier blunders. In brief, by helping on the nationalists of North Germany and Italy he offended French public opinion; and his belated and spasmodic efforts to regain popularity at home aroused against him the distrust of all the Powers. Their feelings about him may be summarised in the _mot_ of a diplomatist, "Scratch the Emperor and you will find the political refugee." [Footnote 20: Chauvinist is a term corresponding to our "Jingo." It is derived from a man named Chauvin, who lauded Napoleon I. and French glory to the skies.] How different were the careers of Napoleon III. and of Bismarck! By |
|


