Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine — Volume 55, No. 341, March, 1844 by Various
page 59 of 303 (19%)
page 59 of 303 (19%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
posterity, as those of the Aspasias and Lauras of antiquity have reached
our own--as having held philosophers by the beard, and trampled on the necks of the conquerors of mankind--as being those for whom Solon legislated, and to whom Pericles succumbed? Pausanius tells us of the stately tomb of the frail Pythonice in the Vica Sacra; and we know that Phryne offered to rebuild the walls of Thebes, by Alexander overthrown. And surely, if modern guide-books instruct us to weep in the cemetery of Père la Chaise over the grave of Fanny Bias, history will say a word or two in honour of Cerito, who proposed through the newspapers, last season, an alliance offensive and defensive with no less a man than Peter Borthwick, Esq. M.P., (_Arcades ambo_!) to relieve the distress of the manufacturing classes of Great Britain! It is true such heroines can afford to be generous; for what lord chancellor or archbishop of modern times commands a revenue half as considerable? Why, therefore--O Public! why, we beseech thee, seeing that the influence of the operative class is fairly understood, and undeniably established among us--why not at once elevate choriography to the rank of one of the fine arts?--Why not concentrate, define, and qualify the calling, by a public academy?--since all hearts and eyes are amenable to the charm of exquisite dancing, why vex ourselves by the sight of what is bad, when better may be achieved? Be wise, O Pubic, and consider! Establish a professor's chair for the improvement of pirouetters. We have hundreds of professor's chairs, quite as unavailable to the advancement of the interests of humanity, and wholly unavailable to its pleasures. Neither painters nor musicians acquire as much popularity as dancers, or amass an equal fortune. Why should they be more highly protected by the state? To disdain this exquisite art, is a proof of barbarism. The nations of the |
|