England's Case Against Home Rule by Albert Venn Dicey
page 21 of 286 (07%)
page 21 of 286 (07%)
|
to fix in our minds precisely what Home Rule does mean and what it does
not mean. [Sidenote: What Home Rule means.] "Home Rule"--or, to speak more accurately, the policy of Home Rule--means, if we may use language with which we are all familiar in relation to the Colonies, the endowment of Ireland with representative institutions and responsible government. It means, therefore, the creation of an Irish Parliament which shall have legislative authority in matters of Irish concern, and of an Irish executive responsible (in general) for its acts to the Irish Parliament or the Irish people. Hence every scheme of Home Rule which merits that name is marked by three features--_first_, the creation of an Irish Parliament; _secondly_, the right of the Irish Parliament to legislate within its own sphere (however that sphere may be defined) with habitual freedom from the control of the Imperial or British Parliament; and _thirdly_, the habitual responsibility of the Irish executive for its acts to the Irish people or to their representatives. These three characteristics, which I do not attempt to define with anything like logical precision, constitute the essence of Home Rule. Other things, however important in themselves, are matters of subordinate detail, and open to discussion or compromise. The limitations to the sphere within which the Irish Parliament is to exert independent authority, the definition of the term "Irish concerns," the constitution of the Irish Parliament, the nature and appointment of the Irish executive (which, though it is no doubt generally assumed to be a Cabinet chosen in effect like the Victorian Ministry, by the local |
|