Three Contributions to the Theory of Sex by Sigmund Freud
page 13 of 174 (07%)
page 13 of 174 (07%)
|
The popular theory of the sexual impulse corresponds closely to the poetic fable of dividing the person into two halves--man and woman--who strive to become reunited through love. It is therefore very surprising to hear that there are men for whom the sexual object is not woman but man, and that there are women for whom it is not man but woman. Such _persons_ are called contrary sexuals, or better, inverts; the _condition_, that of inversion. The number of such individuals is considerable though difficult of accurate determination.[3] A. _Inversion_ *The Behavior of Inverts.*--The above-mentioned persons behave in many ways quite differently. (_a_) They are absolutely inverted; _i.e._, their sexual object must be always of the same sex, while the opposite sex can never be to them an object of sexual longing, but leaves them indifferent or may even evoke sexual repugnance. As men they are unable, on account of this repugnance, to perform the normal sexual act or miss all pleasure in its performance. (_b_) They are amphigenously inverted (psychosexually hermaphroditic); _i.e._, their sexual object may belong indifferently to either the same or to the other sex. The inversion lacks the character of exclusiveness. (_c_) They are occasionally inverted; _i.e._, under certain external conditions, chief among which are the inaccessibility of the normal sexual object and initiation, they are able to take as the sexual |
|