Scientific American Supplement No. 822, October 3, 1891 by Various
page 7 of 161 (04%)
page 7 of 161 (04%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
selected as the latest efforts of shipbuilding skill in France and
Great Britain. Nothing but the armored surface in each several class is shown, the same scale having been adhered to in all cases. [Illustration: Armored Surface for Various Ships] Two impressions cannot fail to be made upon our minds, both as to French and British armor plate disposition. These two impressions, as regards Great Britain, point to the Royal Sovereign as embodying the idea of two protected stations with a narrow and partial connecting belt; and to the Nile as embodying the idea of a vast and absolutely protected raft. For France, we have the Marceau as representing the wholly belted type with four disconnected but protected stations; and the Dupuy de Lôme, in which the armor plating is thinned out to a substance of only 4 in., so as entirely to cover the sides of the vessel down to 5 ft, below the water line; this thickness of plating being regarded as sufficient to break up upon its surface the dreaded mélinite or guncotton shell, but permitting the passage of armor-piercing projectiles right through from side to side; provision being made to prevent damage from these latter to engines and vitals by means of double-armored decks below, with a belt of cellulose between them. Thus, as we have explained, two prominent ideas are present in the disposition of armor upon the battleships of Great Britain, as well as in that of the battleships of France. But, while in our country these two ideas follow one another in the natural sequence of development, from the Inflexible to the Royal Sovereign, the citadel being gradually extended into two redoubts, and space being left between the redoubts for an auxiliary battery--this latter being, however, singularly placed above the armored belt, and _not within its shelter_--in France, on the other hand, we find the second |
|