Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 152, April 18, 1917 by Various
page 45 of 53 (84%)
page 45 of 53 (84%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
knowledge of his own, that _Crawshaw_ was meant to be a Tory and _Meriton_
a Liberal. The latter eventually succumbed to pressure on the part of _Crawshaw's_ daughter, who cared nothing for names so long as she could marry the man of her choice--a prospect denied to her by her father, who thought little of poor men. Meanwhile _Meriton's_ lofty attitude of general contempt for money, and particular contempt for it when offered on degrading terms, gave scope for a little serious relief. [Illustration: THE POLITICIAN AT HOME. _Robert Crawshaw, M.P_ ... MR. NIGEL PLAYFAIR. _Mrs. Crawshaw_ ... MISS HELEN HAYE.] There are, of course, more ways of viewing the question than could be compressed into so short a play. Myself, I confess to a sneaking sympathy with the standpoint of _Crawshaw_. Money for him did not mean mere self-indulgence; it meant outward show--a house in a better neighbourhood, a more expensive car, a higher status in the opinion of his world--all the things that somehow help in what is called a career. By accepting the fifty thousand pounds he would gain something in the public eye; by assuming the name of Wurzel-Flummery he would lose something. He weighed the two against one another, and concluded that he would gain more than he would lose. This argument furnished a good enough motive according to his lights. _Meriton_, on the other hand, after professing to prefer a clean heart to filthy lucre, is persuaded by _Violet Crawshaw_, who argues that he would surely make any sacrifice to save her from starving, and she was starving |
|