English Literature, Considered as an Interpreter of English History - Designed as a Manual of Instruction by Henry Coppee
page 89 of 561 (15%)
page 89 of 561 (15%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
THE FRIAR AND THE SOMPNOUR.--His satire extends also to the friar, who has not even that semblance of virtue which is the tribute of the hypocrite to our holy faith. He is not even the demure rascal conceived by Thomson in his Castle of Indolence: ... the first amid the fry, * * * * * A little round, fat, oily man of God, Who had a roguish twinkle in his eye, When a tight maiden chanced to trippen by, * * * * * Which when observed, he shrunk into his mew, And straight would recollect his piety anew. But Chaucer's friar is a wanton and merry scoundrel, taking every license, kissing the wives and talking love-talk to the girls in his wanderings, as he begs for his Church and his order. His hood is stuffed with trinkets to give them; he is worthily known as the best beggar of his house; his eyes alight with wine, he strikes his little harp, trolls out funny songs and love-ditties. Anon, his frolic over, he preaches to the collected crowd violent denunciations of the parish priest, within the very limits of his parish. The very principles upon which these mendicant orders were established seem to be elements of evil. That they might be better than the monks, they had no cloisters and magnificent gardens, with |
|