A Full Enquiry into the Nature of the Pastoral (1717) by Thomas Purney
page 84 of 105 (80%)
page 84 of 105 (80%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
That a Shepherd should talk in a different Dialect from other People, is
allow'd by all. That the Pastoral Language should be soft and agreeable is equally past dispute. The only remaining Question then is, what it is that composes such a Dialect, and how to attain it. In order to compose a Pastoral Dialect entirely perfect; the first thing, I think, a Writer has to do, is, as we said before, to enervate it and deprive it of all strength. As for the manner of enervating a Language, it must be perform'd by the Genius of the Poet, and not shown by a Critick. However when the Thing is done, 'tis not difficult to see what chiefly effected it. There are, I think, _Cubbin_, two Things that principally enervate your Language. _First_, 'Tis perform'd by throwing out all Words that are _Sonorous_ and raise a _Verse_. Mr. _PHILIPS_ comes the nearest to a Pastoral Language of any English Swain but _Spencer_. And he has truly enervated his Language in four several Lines. One of which is the last of these two. _Ye Swains, I beg ye pass in silence by; My Love in yonder Vale asleep doth lye_. The Word Doth, is what enervates the last Line. But 'twould be still better enervated if Mr. _Philips_ had used only such Words as have very few Consonants in them. For by Consonants, joyn'd with the Vowel O, a Writer may render his Language, in Epick Poetry, just as Sonorous as he will; and by the want of Consonants and by delighting in the other soft Vowels he may render it weak. I cannot see that Mr. _PHILIPS_ has any Line where the Language is wholly enervated. But see how _Spencer_ has |
|