An apology for the study of northern antiquities by Elizabeth Elstob
page 20 of 54 (37%)
page 20 of 54 (37%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
Words[D]; for which the _Saxon_ Language is very remarkable, as has
been before observed, and of which there are numerous Examples, in the following Treatise of _Saxon Grammar_, and infinitely more might have been added. [Footnote D: Of this the _Greeks_ give as a fair Example, when they express the Original and Author of all Things, their +Patêr andrônte theônte+, by their Monosyllable +Zeus+. As the _Hebrews_ do by ++yah++, the _Goths_ the Ancestors of our _Saxon_ Progenitors by the Word ++GOÞ++, the _Saxons_, old _Germans_, _Teutons_, _Francick_, and _English_, in the _Monosyllable_ *Goð*, the _Germans_ #Gott#, and the _French_ _Dieu_.] The second Enquiry is, whether or no the Copiousness and Variety of _Monosyllables_ may be always justly reputed a fault, and may not as justly be thought, to be very useful and ornamental? Were this a fault, it might as justly be charged upon the learned Languages, the _Latin_ and _Greek_: For the _Latin_ you have in _Lilly_'s Rules concerning Nouns, several Verses, made up for the most part of _Monosyllables_, I mention him not as a Classick, but because the Words are Classical and _Monosyllables_; and in the _Greek_ there are several as it were, idle _Monosyllables_, that have little Significancy, except to make the Numbers in Verse compleat, or to give a Fulness to their Periods, as the Verses of _Homer_ and other _Greek Poets_ plainly evidence: An Instance or two may suffice; +Ex hou dê ta prôta diastêtên erisante.+ Here are four _Monosyllables_ in this Verse, |
|