Venereal Diseases in New Zealand (1922) - Report of the Special Committee of the Board of Health appointed by - the Hon. Minister of Health by Committee Of The Board Of Health
page 59 of 104 (56%)
page 59 of 104 (56%)
|
suffering from ... _(b)_ venereal disease?"--might be strengthened by
adopting the Australian quarantine service equivalent viz., "Is there now or has there been on board during the voyage any person suffering from demonstrable syphilis in an active condition, or other communicable disease?" The evidence given does not show that the number of venereal-diseases cases already in the Dominion is greatly added to by the introduction of cases from overseas. Since 1903 persons suffering from syphilis have been "prohibited immigrants" within the meaning of the Immigration Restriction Act. SECTION 5.--PROPHYLAXIS. Before discussing this question it is desirable clearly to distinguish between the procedures which are included under this term. These are-- (1.) The supply of drugs and appliances which are made available for use by the individual before exposure to infection. This may be described as "anticipatory prophylaxis," and has commonly been designated the "packet system." The Committee condemn this procedure, for these reasons: (i) That the system suggests a moral sanction to vice; (ii) that the individual is lulled into a false sense of security, and may thereby be encouraged repeatedly to expose himself to infection; (iii) that the individual may be thereby deterred from seeking early advice or treatment; (iv) that the drugs supplied may be used for treating disease should it arise, and so delay may result in |
|