The Virgin-Birth of Our Lord - A paper read (in substance) before the confraternity of the Holy - Trinity at Cambridge by B. W. Randolph
page 26 of 40 (65%)
page 26 of 40 (65%)
|
Certainly it would seem to be in a high degree improbable that two such accounts as those of the Birth of Jesus Christ which we have in these two Gospels should be the work of forgers; and this improbability is further heightened when we compare them with the legendary accounts of His infancy which were actually current in the early centuries.+ -- * Swete, Church Congress Report (1902), p. 163. + See Preface, p. xi. -- III THE SILENCE OF OTHER NEW TESTAMENT WRITERS What are the objections brought against all this evidence? The main objection is the silence of the other writers of the New Testament. To reply-- (I) First, we may surely ask--Why should they mention it? This sort of argument from silence is most precarious. Are we to infer that because there is no mention of the Cross or the Crucifixion in the Epistles of St. James or of St. Jude, that it was unknown to this group of writers, and that they were unaware of the manner of Christ's Death? |
|