New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol 2, No. 1, April, 1915 - April-September, 1915 by Various
page 44 of 450 (09%)
page 44 of 450 (09%)
|
urged with great force that there should be also some limit to "the
radius of activity," and especially so if this action by the belligerents can be construed to be a blockade. It would certainly create a serious state of affairs if, for example, an American vessel laden with a cargo of German origin should escape the British patrol in European waters only to be held up by a cruiser off New York and taken into Halifax. Similar cablegrams sent to Paris. BRYAN. V. BRITISH REPLY TO THE AMERICAN INQUIRY. _The reply from the British Government transmitted by the American Ambassador at London to the Secretary of State concerning the method of enforcing the reprisal order follows:_ LONDON, March 15, 1915. Following is the full text of a note dated today and an Order in Council I have just received from Grey: "1. His Majesty's Government have had under careful consideration the inquiries which, under instructions from your Government, your Excellency addressed to me on the 8th inst., regarding the scope and mode of application of the measures foreshadowed in the British and |
|