Book-bot.com - read famous books online for free

New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 2, May, 1915 - April-September, 1915 by Various
page 151 of 430 (35%)
an odious thing, but no less silly and absurd. For have we not reached
the ridiculous when the incendiaries of Louvain, and Malines, and
Rheims, the assassins of women and children, and of the wounded, already
find it necessary to repudiate their actions, at least in words, and to
impose upon the servility of their ninety-three Kulturträger such
denials as this: "It is not true that we are making war in contempt of
the law of nations, nor that our soldiers are committing acts of
cruelty, or of insubordination, or indiscipline.... We will carry this
conflict through to the end as a civilized people, and we answer for
this upon our good name and upon our honor!" Why this humble and pitiful
repudiation? Perhaps because their theory of war rested upon the
postulate of their invincibility, and that, in the first shiver of their
defeat upon the Marne, it collapsed, and now their repudiation quickly
follows--in dread of the _lex talionis_.

[Illustration: Figure 17.]

[Illustration: Figure 18. [Continuation of Figure 17.]]

I will stop here. I leave the conclusion to the allied armies, already
in sight of victory.

NOTE.--General Stenger's order of the day, mentioned on page
[Transcriber's Note: blank in original], was communicated
orally by various officers in various units of the brigade.
Consequently, the form in which we have received it may
possibly be incomplete or altered. In face of any doubt, the
French Government has ordered an inquiry to be made into the
prisoners' camps. Not one of the prisoners to whom our
magistrates presented the order of the day in the
DigitalOcean Referral Badge