A Leap in the Dark - A Criticism of the Principles of Home Rule as Illustrated by the - Bill of 1893 by Albert Venn Dicey
page 33 of 237 (13%)
page 33 of 237 (13%)
|
[5] References made in this treatise to the Home Rule Bill are, unless
otherwise stated, made to the Bill as ordered to be printed by the House of Commons, February 17, 1893. _A Leap in the Dark_ was published months before the Bill was sent up as amended to the House of Lords. [6] This is true of both of Mr. Gladstone's Home Rule Bills, and must necessarily be true of any Bill which satisfies even for a time the wishes of Home Rulers. [7] I have substituted New Zealand for Victoria as the example of a typical self-governing colony; the position of Victoria has since 1900 been complicated by the country having become a State of the Australian Commonwealth or Confederation. [8] See Dicey, _Law of Constitution_ (7th ed.), ch. iii. pp. 136-140. Compare Mill, _Rep. Government_, ch. xvii. [9] For the sake of convenience I throughout this treatise refer to the 'Bill to amend the provision for the government of Ireland' under its popular name of the Home Rule Bill, 1893, or simply the Bill. See the Bill in Appendix. [10] Bill, clause 5. [11] (The constitutional history of Victoria affords a curious illustration of what will certainly happen in Ireland.) In Victoria the Legislature, though not termed a Parliament in the Constitution Act, 18 & 19 Vict, c. 54, has assumed, under a Victorian Act, the title of the Parliament of Victoria. See Jenks, _Government of Victoria_, p. 236. Who can doubt that the Irish Legislature will, by an Irish Act, give itself |
|