Piano Mastery - Talks with Master Pianists and Teachers by Harriette Brower
page 52 of 211 (24%)
page 52 of 211 (24%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
end I endeavor to stimulate interest in the wonders of the visible
universe, the intellectual achievements of men and the deep things of spiritual discernment. IN REGARD TO INTERPRETATION "On this subject I think we should avoid pedantry; not to say to the pupil, you must play this piece a certain way; but rather say, I see or feel it in this way, and give the reasons underlying the conception. I believe the successful teacher should be a pianist. He should understand every point and be able to _do_ the thing, else how can he really show the manner of the doing? Many of the _nuances_, subtleties of color and phrase, effects of charm or of bravura, cannot be explained; they must be illustrated. And furthermore, only he who has been over the road can be a safe or sympathetic guide. Tolstoi realized he could not be of service to the people he would uplift unless he lived among them, shared their trials and experienced their needs. The time has gone by when the musician and composer was considered a sort of freak, knowing music and nothing else. We know the great composers were men of the highest intelligence and learning, men whose aim was to work out their genius to the utmost perfection. Nothing less than the highest would satisfy them. As George Eliot said, 'Genius is the capacity for taking infinite pains.' Think of the care Beethoven took with every phrase, how many times he did it over, never leaving it till he was satisfied." In speaking of the great European teachers Mr. Roeder continued: "We hear much of the Leschetizky method; but with that master technic is quite a secondary matter over which, when once the principles are |
|