Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine - Volume 56, No. 346, August, 1844 by Various
page 42 of 310 (13%)
page 42 of 310 (13%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
kids, we forswear in a tragedy so torturing to our national
sensibilities. We pass, in sympathy with the burning wrath of our readers, the madness of dallying and moping over the question--to starve or not to starve. We pass the infamy of entertaining a treaty with barbarians, _commenced_ in this foul insult to a British army--that _after_ we should have submitted to indignities past expression, they (the barbarians) would consider at their leisure whether it would please them to spare our necks; a villany that gallant men _could_ not have sanctioned, an which too certainly was not hurled back in their teeth as it ought to have been. We pass the lunacy of _tempting_ barbarians to a perfidy almost systematic in their policy, by consenting to a conference _outside_ the British cantonments, not even within range of the British guns, not even within the overlooking of British eyes. We pass the lunacy of taking out sixteen men as an escort against a number absolutely unlimited of the enemy, and where no restraint, even of honour or mutual understanding, forbade that unlimited enemy to come armed from head to foot. It is a trifle to add--that no instructions were given to the sixteen men as to what they were to do, or in what circumstances to act; and accordingly that one man only, out of the whole sixteen, attempted any resistance; and this in defiance of warnings eight several times reiterated by English officers, and by friendly Affghans, that treachery was designed. We pass the triple lunacy of treating at all in a case where Sir William M'Naughtan well knew, and himself avowed his knowledge, that no man or party existed amongst the enemy who could pretend to have authority sufficient for ratifying, or for executing, any treat of whatsoever tenor. The Cabool forces perished eventually by the _dissension_ of the two first in command. This is notorious. And yet, to mark the dread fatality which pursued them, the _concord_ of these two officers was even more destructive to their victims than the worst of their disputes. In the |
|