Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 103, November 12, 1892 by Various
page 14 of 41 (34%)
page 14 of 41 (34%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
ROSE LARKING.
P.S.--I am so glad you write the word "lunch," and not "luncheon." I told FRED that--but he went to _Johnson's Dictionary_, and read out something about "Lunch" being only a colloquial form of "luncheon." Still, I don't care a little bit. Dr. JOHNSON lived so long ago, and couldn't possibly know _everything_--could he? R.L. My darling young lady, I reply, your letter has made a deep impression on me. Dr. JOHNSON did, as you say, live many years ago; so many years ago, in fact, that (as a little friend of _Mr. Punch_ once said, with a sigh, on hearing that someone would have been one hundred and fifty years old if he had been alive at the present day) he must be "a orfle old angel now." The word "lunch" is short, crisp, and appetising. The word "luncheon" is of a certain pomposity, which, though it may suit the mansions of the great, is out of place when applied to the meals of active sportsmen. So we will continue, if you please, to speak of "lunch." And now for your question. My charming ROSE, this little treatise does not profess to do anything more than teach young sportsmen how to converse. I assume that they have learnt shooting from other instructors. And as to the details of shooting-parties, how they should be composed, what they should do or avoid, and how they should bear themselves generally--the subject is too great, too solemn, too noble to be entered upon with a light heart. At any rate, that is not my purpose here. It was rude--_very_ rude--of FRED to say you were a bore--and I am sure it wasn't true. I can picture you tripping daintily along with your pretty companions to the lunch _rendezvous_. You are dressed in a perfectly fitting, tailor-made |
|