The Economic Consequences of the Peace by John Maynard Keynes
page 78 of 243 (32%)
page 78 of 243 (32%)
|
[16] Arts. 121 and 297(b). The exercise or non-exercise of this option of expropriation appears to lie, not with the Reparation Commission, but with the particular Power in whose territory the property has become situated by cession or mandation. [17] Art. 297 (h) and para. 4 of Annex to Part X. Section IV. [18] Arts. 53 and 74. [19] In 1871 Germany granted France credit for the railways of Alsace-Lorraine but not for State property. At that time, however, the railways were private property. As they afterwards became the property of the German Government, the French Government have held, in spite of the large additional capital which Germany has sunk in them, that their treatment must follow the precedent of State property generally. [20] Arts. 55 and 255. This follows the precedent of 1871. [21] Art. 297 (_b_). [22] Part X. Sections III. and IV. and Art. 243. [23] The interpretation of the words between inverted commas is a little dubious. The phrase is so wide as to seem to include private debts. But in the final draft of the Treaty private debts are not explicitly referred to. [24] This provision is mitigated in the case of German property in Poland and the other new States, the proceeds of liquidation in these |
|