Esther by Jean Baptiste Racine
page 6 of 190 (03%)
page 6 of 190 (03%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
Corneille purified both thought and language of the bad taste due to
the prevailing Spanish influence. He subordinated the actor to the play, instead of composing, as his predecessors had done, lengthy monologues for mere histrionic display. He did away with absurdly tangled plots, and focussed the interest of tragedy on character. Tragedy thus purified, he made immortal by the strength and elevation of his moral teaching. His principal plays are _Le Cid_ (1636), _Cinna_ (1639), _Polyeucte_ (1640). The new tragedy shaped by Corneille, Racine carried to its highest perfection of form. Nothing in his plays betokens struggle, innovation, or effort. His is the polished finish of ease and ripeness. Subtle delineation of the passions, profound tenderness, faultlessness of style and expression, distinguish him above all others. Yet this very perfection of form robs him of some of the rough, wholesome vigor, which makes Corneille's plays the most healthy reading in the French language. Corneille speaks by the mouths of heroes, Racine speaks by the mouths of men. Voltaire is only to be placed by their side for the extraordinary skill, amounting to genius, with which he followed in their footsteps. We must not look to him for new departures, nor indeed for the lofty authority of the one, or the harmonious richness of the other. Yet in each particular he succeeds, by the force of art, in getting within measurable distance of his models: his _Zaïre_ (1733) and _Mérope_ (1743) would hardly have been disowned by either. After Voltaire, new times demanded new methods. The nineteenth century reacted against the portraiture of character alone, and required more complete representation of the action; it called for deeds enacted on |
|