Punch or the London Charivari, Volume 158, March 24, 1920. by Various
page 35 of 59 (59%)
page 35 of 59 (59%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
there was at least a plausible case for the contention that the boot
was on the other leg. [Illustration: "CONTROLLERS" CONTROLLED. MR CLYNES. MR. MCCURDY. MR. G. ROBERTS.] It is unusual to find Members of the House of Commons objecting to their speeches being reported, but apparently some of them do--when the reporters are police constables. The HOME SECRETARY thought it quite possible that if Members attended certain meetings the official stenographers might think it worth while to take down their utterances but I gathered that he was not prepared to give any guarantee on the subject, and that Colonel WEDGWOOD and Lieut.-Commander KENWORTHY must not count too confidently on having a further road to fame opened to them. [Illustration: THE CORNUCOPIA, OR HORNE OF PLENTY. SIR ROBERT HORNE.] Mr. BONAR LAW read a telegram from Lord KILMARNOCK regarding the situation in Berlin. As it was already a day old, was admittedly based on a _communiqué_ from _Wolff's Bureau_, "censored" by Mr. TREBITSCH LINCOLN (late Liberal Member for Darlington), and had in the meantime been officially contradicted by the old Government, it did not add much to our knowledge. Time was when it was usual to move to reduce a Vote by a hundred pounds if you wanted to defeat the Government. But such paltry figures are no good in these spacious days. Sir DONALD MACLEANS'S proposed reduction in the Vote on Account for the Civil Services was the |
|