temptations, seemed the only possible way to live purely.
To get far beyond the influence of a barbaric society, utterly
antagonistic to peaceful religious observance, was clearly the
surest means of achieving personal holiness. Monachism
was a system designed for these ends. Throughout the
Middle Ages it was the refuge--the only refuge--for the
man who desired to flee from sin. Such, at any rate, was
the truly religious man's view. And if monkish retreats
sheltered some ignorant fanatics, they also attracted many
representatives of the culture and learning of the time.
This was bound to be so. At all times solitude has been
pleasant to the student and thinker, or to the moody lover
of books.

By great good fortune, then, the studious occupations
which did so much to soften monkish austerities in the
Middle Ages, were recognised early as needful to the system.
Even the ascetics by the Red Sea and in Nitria did not
deprive themselves of all literary solace, although the more
fanatical would abjure it, and many would be too poor to
have it. The Rule of Pachomius, founder of the settlements
of Tabenna, required the brethren's books to be kept in a
cupboard and regulated lending them. These libraries are
referred to in Benedict's own Rule. We hear of St. Pachomius
destroying a copy of Origen, because the teaching in it was
obnoxious; of Abba Bischoi writing an ascetic work, a copy of
which is extant; of anchorites under St. Macarius of Alexandria
transcribing books; and of St. Jerome collecting a
library summo studio et labore, copying manuscripts and studying
Hebrew at his hermitage even after a formal renunciation