Matthew Arnold by George Saintsbury
page 44 of 197 (22%)
page 44 of 197 (22%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
imagine.
FOOTNOTES: [1] The editor glosses this variously spelt and etymologically puzzling word "landing-stage." But unless I mistake, a "kempshott," "campshed," or "campshedding" is not a landing-stage (though it helps to make one) so much as a river-wall of stakes and planks, put to guard the bank against floods, the wash of barges, &c. [2] _Glen Desseray and other Poems_. By John Campbell Shairp, London, 1888. P. 218. [3] This statement may seem too sweeping, especially as there is neither room nor occasion for justifying it fully. Let us only indicate, as among the heads of such a justification, the following sins of English criticism between 1840-1860,--the slow and reluctant acceptance even of Tennyson, even of Thackeray; the obstinate refusal to give Browning, even after _Bells and Pomegranates_, a fair hearing; the recalcitrance to Carlyle among the elder, and Mr Ruskin among the younger, innovators in prose; the rejection of a book of erratic genius like _Lavengro_; the ignoring of work of such combined intrinsic beauty and historic importance as _The Defence of Guenevere_ and FitzGerald's _Omar Khayyam_. For a sort of quintessence of literary Philistinism, see the advice of Richard Ford (himself no Philistine) to George Borrow, in Professor Knapp's _Life_ of the latter, i. 387. [4] This "undertone," as Mr Shairp calls it. |
|