A Critical Essay on Characteristic-Writings - From his translation of The Moral Characters of Theophrastus (1725) by Henry Gally
page 31 of 53 (58%)
page 31 of 53 (58%)
|
swallows down both the Dice and almost the Box, and at the same
Time throws the Glass of Water into the Tables.--If this is not to overstrain the Bow, to carry Things to an unnatural Excess and Extravagance, and to make no Distinction between Absence of Mind and Insensibility, or downright Folly, I confess, I know not what is. _Mr. de la Bruyere_ should have considerâd, that a Man, who has lost his Feeling, is not, in that Respect, a proper Subject for Ridicule, and that âtis no Jest to take away a Manâs Senses. Extravagances of this Nature are no Beauties in any Kind of Writing, much less in Characteristics. In Performances of this Kind there must be Spirit and Strength, but especially there must be Justice. The real Images of Life must be represented, or the Probabilities of Nature must strictly be observâd. [M] _Respicere exemplar vitæ morumque jubebo Doctum imitatorem, & vivas hinc ducere voces._ These are the likeliest Copies, which are drawn By the Original of human Life. Ld. _Roscommon_. [M: Horat. in Art. Poet. _v._ 317, &c.] The Strokes which compose a Character must be bold, but not extravagant. Nature must not be distorted, to excite either Ridicule or Admiration. Reason must hold the Reins of the Imagination: Judgment must direct the Fancy; otherwise we shall be apt to miscarry, and connect inconsistent Ideas, at the very Time, when we think we hit the Point of Humour to the Life. |
|