Essays on the Stage - Preface to the Campaigners (1689) and Preface to the Translation of Bossuet's Maxims and Reflections on Plays (1699) by Thomas D'Urfey
page 50 of 76 (65%)
page 50 of 76 (65%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
Protagonists, Nauseous Ribaldry, Ranting Smutt, Abominable Stench_,
Venus _and St _George_, _Juliana_, the Witch and the Parson of _Wrotham_ [Footnote: Collier's Epithetes.], with the admirable Popish story of the Woman that went to the Play-House and brought home the Devil with her_ [Footnote: Collier, p. 257.]--And the Devil's in't indeed, if this charming Rhetorick of his, (since he calls mine so) especially joyn'd with that fine story from _Tertullian_, don't divert the Ladies as well as t'other; for 'tis very like a Catholick miracle you must know, and the top wit of it is, that when the Parson is Conjuring, _he asks the Devil how he durst attack a Christian?_ who, like an admirable Joker as he was, answers, _I have done nothing but what I can justify, for I seiz'd her upon my own ground_. Now let the Devil be as witty as he can, I am sure the story, maugre _Tertullian_'s Authority, or the Doctor's either, is confounded silly, and downright nonsense, what credit soever it has with him for its likeness to Jesuiticism. And now I think I have prov'd too, that _a Clergy man can speak nonsense, pass it for humour too, and gratify his ease and his malice at once, without a Poet's putting his into his Mouth_. And since we have been speaking of quibbling, I shall digress a little to entertain the Reader on that subject. Our Critick rallies Mr _Dryden_'s _Sancho_ in _Love Triumphant_, for saying, _dont provoke me, I'm mischievously bent_, to which _Carlos_ a man of sense replys, _nay you are bent enough in conscience, but I have a bent Fist for Boxing; Here_ says he (smartly) _you have a brace of quibbles started in a line and a half [Footnote: Collier, p. 170.]_--Very true, you have so--But suppose quibbling or punning--but I think this is call'd punning--Is this Gentlemans humour--if so, being a Soldier, I don't see it calls his sense in question at all--but now pray let's see, how our Critick manages a quibble, with a blunder tack'd to the Tail on't, in the page before, there, in the aforesaid Play, _Celidea_ in a passion cries, |
|