The Closet of Sir Kenelm Digby Knight Opened by Kenelm Digby
page 3 of 321 (00%)
page 3 of 321 (00%)
|
something versatile and brilliant and romantic. He remains a perpetual type
of the hero of romance, the double hero, in the field of action and the realm of the spirit. Had he lived in an earlier age he would now be a mythological personage; and even without the looming exaggeration and glamour of myth he still imposes. The men of to-day seem all of little stature, and less consequence, beside the gigantic creature who made his way with equal address and audacity in courts and councils, laboratories and ladies' bowers. So when, in a seventeenth-century bookseller's advertisement, I lighted on a reference to the curious compilation of receipts entitled _The Closet of Sir Kenelm Digby Opened_, having the usual idea of him as a great gentleman, romantic Royalist, and somewhat out-of-date philosopher, I was enough astonished at seeing his name attached to what seemed to me, in my ignorance, outside even his wide fields of interest, to hunt for the book without delay, examine its contents, and inquire as to its authenticity. Of course I found it was not unknown. Though the _Dictionary of National Biography_ omits any reference to it, and its name does not occur in Mr. Carew Hazlitt's _Old Cookery Books_, Dr. Murray quotes it in his great Dictionary, and it is mentioned and discussed in _The Life of Digby by One of his Descendants_. But Mr. Longueville treats it therein with too scant deference. One of a large and interesting series of contemporary books of the kind, its own individual interest is not small; and I commend it with confidence to students of seventeenth-century domestic manners. To apologise for it, to treat it as if it were some freak, some unowned sin of Digby's, would be the greatest mistake. On the contrary, its connection with his life and career is of the closest; and I make bold to assert that of all his works, with the doubtful exception of his _Memoirs_, it is the one best worth reprinting. It is in no spirit of irony that I say of him who in his own day was looked on almost as Bacon's equal, who was the |
|