Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 158, February 25th, 1920 by Various
page 44 of 60 (73%)
page 44 of 60 (73%)
|
precisely, I suppose he felt annoyed by this lack of originality. If we men
are like that, it wasn't nice of Mr. DENNY to give us away. At any rate I am sure Mr. DONALD CALTHROP didn't believe in _Peter_ all the time. When he did he was very good indeed. When he didn't he was horrid. Did Miss IRIS HOEY believe in _Judy_? I am not so sure. I suspect not. Did I believe in either? I did not. I was a little surprised that Miss JOAN VIVIAN-REES should so overplay her _Trixie_. Her work is certainly in general not like that, and I conjecture the influence of some baleful autocrat of a producer. It seemed to me that Miss MILDRED EVELYN'S _Milly_ was, all things considered, a capable and consistent study of a desperately unsympathetic character, a more difficult and creditable feat than is commonly supposed. T. "WILD GEESE." [Illustration: _Mr. JACK BUCHANAN_ (_Hon. Bill Malcolm_). "WHAT'S THE IDEA? ARE YOU BY ANY CHANCE TRYING TO GIVE ME THE COLD SHOULDER?" _Miss PHYLLIS MONKMAN_ (_Violet Braid_). "NO. I JUST KEEP ON DOING THIS FOR THE LOOK OF THE THING."] I should hesitate to accuse Mr. RONALD JEANS of originality in the design of his musical trifle at the Comedy. The idea of a company of women that bans the society of men is at least as old as the Attic stage. But it is to his credit that though the theme invited suggestiveness he at least avoided the licence of _The Lysistrata_. Indeed there were moments when his |
|