The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915 - What Americans Say to Europe by Various
page 27 of 499 (05%)
page 27 of 499 (05%)
|
"First and last, we take the ground that this question must be localized _by the abstention of all the powers from intervention in it_," but added that Germany would, if an Austro-Russian dispute arose, "co-operate with the other great powers in mediation between Russia and Austria." [German "White Paper," Annex 13.] This distinction is very hard to grasp. It attempts to measure the difference between tweedledum and tweedledee. Russia's difference with Austria was over the attempt of the latter to crush Servia. Germany would not interfere in the latter, but would as an abstract proposition mediate between Russia and Austria. For all practical purposes the two things were indistinguishable. How she "co-operated" we shall presently see. All that Germany _did_ on July 25, so far as the record discloses, was to "pass on" England's and Russia's requests for more time, but subsequent events indicate that it was "passed on" without any indorsement, for is it credible that Austria would have ignored its ally's request for more time if it had ever been made? The Austrian Foreign Minister, having launched the ultimatum, absented himself from the capital, but the Russian Minister at Vienna, as already stated, succeeded in submitting this most reasonable request verbally to |
|