The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915 - What Americans Say to Europe by Various
page 33 of 499 (06%)
page 33 of 499 (06%)
|
"and even to fall back before an Austrian advance in order to
gain time." He urged that the Austrian Ambassador at St. Petersburg should be furnished with full powers to continue discussions with the Russian Minister for Foreign Affairs, "who was very willing to advise Servia to yield all that could be fairly asked of her as an independent power." The only reply to this reasonable suggestion was that it would be submitted to the Minister for Foreign Affairs. [English "White Paper," No. 56.] On the same day the German Ambassador at Paris called upon the French Foreign Office and strongly insisted on the "_exclusion of all possibility of mediation or of conference_," and yet contemporaneously the Imperial German Chancellor was advising London that he had "started the efforts toward mediation in Vienna, immediately in the way desired by Sir Edward Grey, and had further communicated to the Austrian Foreign Minister the wish of the Russian Foreign Minister for a direct talk in Vienna." What hypocrisy! In the formal German defense, the official apologist for that country, after stating his conviction "that an act of mediation could not take into consideration the Austro-Servian conflict, which was purely an |
|