The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915 - What Americans Say to Europe by Various
page 44 of 499 (08%)
page 44 of 499 (08%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
this was not satisfactory, and if Germany would make any reasonable
proposals to preserve peace and Russia and France rejected it, that "his Majesty's Government would have nothing to do with the consequences," which obviously meant either neutrality or actual intervention in behalf of Germany and Austria. On the same day the British Ambassador at Berlin besought the German Foreign Office to "put pressure on the authorities at Vienna to do something in the general interest to reassure Russia and to show themselves disposed to continue discussions on a friendly basis." And Sir Edward Goschen reports that the German Foreign Minister replied that last night he had "begged Austria to reply to your last proposal, and that he had received a reply to the effect that the Austrian Minister for Foreign Affairs would take the wishes of the Emperor this morning in the matter." _Again the text of the letter in which Germany "begged" Austria to be conciliatory is not found in the record._ The excuse of Germany that the mobilization of Russia compelled it to mobilize does not justify the war. Mobilization does not necessarily mean aggression, but simply preparation. If Russia had the right to |
|