Sir Walter Scott as a Critic of Literature by Margaret Ball
page 13 of 295 (04%)
page 13 of 295 (04%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
steadily at his vocation, he replied, "The public, with many other
properties of spoiled children, has all their eagerness after novelty, and were I to dedicate my time entirely to poetry they would soon tire of me. I must therefore, I fear, continue to edit a little."[5] His interest in scholarly pursuits appears even in his first attempt at writing prose fiction, since Joseph Strutt's unfinished romance, _Queenhoo Hall_, for which Scott wrote a conclusion, is of consequence only on account of the antiquarian learning which it exhibits. Having become seriously alarmed over the political influence of the _Edinburgh Review_, Scott was active in forwarding plans for starting a strong rival periodical in London, and 1809 saw the establishment of the _Quarterly Review_. By that time he had done a considerable amount of work in practically every kind except the novel, and he was recognized as a most efficient assistant and adviser in any such enterprise as the promoters of the _Quarterly_ were undertaking. Moreover, his own writings were prominent among the books which supplied material for the reviewer. He worked hard for the first volume. But after that year he wrote little for the _Quarterly_ until 1818, and again little until after Lockhart became editor in 1825. From that time until 1831 he was an occasional contributor. 1814 was the year of _Waverley_. Before that the poems had been appearing in rapid succession, and Scott had been busy with the _Works of Swift_, which came out also in 1814. The thirteen volumes of the edition of _Somers' Tracts_, already mentioned, and several smaller books, bore further witness to his editorial energy. The last of the long poems was published in 1815, about the same time with _Guy Mannering_, the second novel, and after that the novels continued to appear with that rapidity which constitutes one of the chief facts of |
|