Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 159, September 1st, 1920 by Various
page 22 of 59 (37%)
page 22 of 59 (37%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
how could I have set them down? Because I was writing unobserved all the
time he was talking, and I could produce the notes if they were, to others, legible enough for it to be worth while; surreptitious writing must necessarily be indistinct at times. As for the question of time and place, that is a mere quibble. Mr. Sadrock was alive when we had our talk, and I am sorry if I have misdated it. The talk remains. May I add that it is very astonishing to me to find people with the effrontery to suggest that they knew their illustrious relatives better than strangers could. Everyone is aware that the last place to go to for evidence as to a man is to his kith and kin. When my book appears there will be a few corrections; but in the main I stand by the motto which I invented for Chamberlain one evening: "What I have written I have written." I am, Yours, etc., THE MARGOTIST. _The Woop._ * * * * * FROM "SADROCK: A DEFINITIVE BIOGRAPHY." _Published in 1940._ Before leaving our consideration of Sadrock's Homeric studies it is however necessary to point out that late in life he made a very curious recantation. In a book of memoirs, published in 1920, by one who was in a position to acquire special information, it is stated in his own words that Sadrock preferred _Robert Elsmere_ to the _Iliad_; while during the same |
|