Creative Chemistry - Descriptive of Recent Achievements in the Chemical Industries by Edwin E. Slosson
page 53 of 299 (17%)
page 53 of 299 (17%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
Consumption of potash for agricultural purposes in different countries]
Germany had a natural monopoly of potash as Chile had a natural monopoly of nitrates. The agriculture of Europe and America has been virtually dependent upon these two sources of plant foods. Now when the world was cleft in twain by the shock of August, 1914, the Allied Powers had the nitrates and the Central Powers had the potash. If Germany had not had up her sleeve a new process for making nitrates she could not long have carried on a war and doubtless would not have ventured upon it. But the outside world had no such substitute for the German potash salts and has not yet discovered one. Consequently the price of potash in the United States jumped from $40 to $400 and the cost of food went up with it. Even under the stimulus of prices ten times the normal and with chemists searching furnace crannies and bad lands the United States was able to scrape up less than 10,000 tons of potash in 1916, and this was barely enough to satisfy our needs for two weeks! [Illustration: What happened to potash when the war broke out. This diagram from the _Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry_ of July, 1917, shows how the supply of potassium muriate from Germany was shut off in 1914 and how its price rose.] Yet potash compounds are as cheap as dirt. Pick up a handful of gravel and you will be able to find much of it feldspar or other mineral containing some ten per cent. of potash. Unfortunately it is in combination with silica, which is harder to break up than a trust. But "constant washing wears away stones" and the potash that the metallurgist finds too hard to extract in his hottest furnace is washed out in the course of time through the dropping of the gentle rain from |
|


