Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 428 - Volume 17, New Series, March 13, 1852 by Various
page 39 of 68 (57%)
page 39 of 68 (57%)
|
Given that there is a door which may or may not be shut on quitting an
apartment, let it be shewn by the rules of arithmetic whether it would be preferable to shut the said door or leave it open. Write down, first, the arguments for not shutting, according to their supposed value; then do the same for the arguments _per contra_; lastly, sum up both, and strike the balance. Thus-- FOR NOT SHUTTING. Because the door is apt to slam, which would be exceedingly unpleasant, and might suggest the idea that you went out in a passion--valued as . . . 4 If it did not slam, it might still make a creaking noise--valued as . . . . . . . . . . 2 Supposing it to make no noise at all, the impression is conveyed that you are going away never to return, whereas you have no such intention, . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Chances of your causing a noise to disturb the company on opening the door when you return, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Probable loss of character by conveying the notion, that you are peremptory and abrupt in manners, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 |
|