The Olden Time Series, Vol. 3: New-England Sunday - Gleanings Chiefly From Old Newspapers Of Boston And Salem, Massachusetts by Henry M. (Henry Mason) Brooks
page 38 of 113 (33%)
page 38 of 113 (33%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
went to walk? They answered that it was partly to exercise, and
partly to perform their duty as professors of religion. They said they had made up their minds that the moiety of the fines they expected to receive, they would give to some charitable institution. The defence rested on two points--_First_, That no crime or act was proved to have been committed in Norfolk county--_Secondly_, If it should be proved that the act complained of had been committed, it was an act of _necessity_ and _mercy_. Counsellor Churchill entered with much spirit into the cause, and evinced that he had bestowed upon it much thought and labour. He gave an elaborate history of the Sabbatical Institution, and stated the various opinions and laws as to the division of holy time. He said that many families in Boston, both poor and rich, depended on milk to feed their children--that a large proportion of the people had no conveniences for keeping it from Saturday night till Monday morning; that those who had no other way of disposing of their milk, but by delivering it to those who would suffer without it, performed an act embracing both _necessity_ and _mercy_; that those who sat up all night for the purpose of being up before day, to fatten on those who were performing the before-named charitable act, were like the Jews of old, who, when the Saviour of mankind raised the dead and restored the blind to sight, cried out, Crucify him! the Jews were but the M'Clures of the present day. The Judge (MITCHELL) charged the jury, that, if they had doubts whether any offence were proved to have been committed, within |
|