Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 159, July 21, 1920 by Various
page 35 of 62 (56%)
page 35 of 62 (56%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
request had been accompanied by a threat, while others were horrified at
the idea of recognising the present _régime_ in Russia, and drew from Mr. Law a hasty disclaimer. The House as a whole would, I think, have liked to learn how you can do business with a person whom you do not recognise? The Chancellor of the Exchequer refused to accept Mr. George Terrell's proposal to reduce the Excess Profits Tax from sixty per cent. to forty, but, in reply to Sir G. Younger--who "has such a way wid him"--promised that next year he would make the reduction. He admitted that it was in many ways an unsatisfactory tax, but the Government could not afford to part with it unless a substitute was provided. Somebody suggested "Economy," and Sir F. Banbury proved to his own satisfaction that the present estimates could be reduced by a hundred-and-fifty millions. But unexpected support for the Government came from Mr. Asquith, who as the original sponsor of the tax felt it his duty to support it. [Illustration: SIR FREDERICK BANBURY SHOWS HOW IT'S DONE. "To produce a saving of one hundred-and-fifty millions you merely have to hold the hat firmly in the left hand--thus."] There was a perfect E.P.D.mic of criticism, but it was brilliantly countered by Mr. Baldwin, who declared that the Chancellor, far from leading the country down the rapids, "was the one man who had seized a rock in mid-stream and was hanging on to it with hands and feet." The Amendment was rejected by 289 to 117, and the clause as a whole was passed by 202 to 16. [Illustration: THE LIMPET OF THE EXCHEQUER. Mr. Baldwin portrays his chief "hanging to a rock with hands and feet."] |
|