The Lost Gospel and Its Contents - Or, The Author of "Supernatural Religion" Refuted by Himself by Michael Ferrebee Sadler
page 48 of 209 (22%)
page 48 of 209 (22%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
as," which would have simply detracted from the force of the passage,
being unintelligible without some explanation. Again, we have in the Dialogue (ch. lxi.) the words "The Word of Wisdom, Who is Himself this God begotten of the Father of all things." Now here there seems to be a reproduction of the old and very probably original reading of John i. 18, [48:1] "The only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father." Certainly this reading of John i. 18 is the only place where the idea of being begotten is associated with the term "God." We next have to notice that Justin repeatedly uses the words "God" and "Lord" in collocation as applied to Jesus Christ; not "the Lord God," the usual Old Testament collocation, but God and Lord, thus: "For Christ is King and Priest and God and Lord," &c. (Dial. ch. xxxiv.) Again:-- "There is, and there is said to be, another God and Lord subject to the Maker of all things." (Dial. lvi.) Now the only Gospel in which these words are to be found together and applied to Christ is that according to St. John, where he records the confession of St. Thomas, "My Lord and my God" (John xx. 28). Again: St. John alone of the Evangelists speaks of our Lord as He that cometh from above [Greek: ho anĂ´then erchomenos], as coming from heaven, as "leaving the world and going to the Father" (John iii. 31; xvi. 28), and Justin reproduces this in the words:-- |
|