Mrs Whittelsey's Magazine for Mothers and Daughters - Volume 3 by Various
page 17 of 472 (03%)
page 17 of 472 (03%)
|
their path. I am aware of the competition which marks every industrial
pursuit in the land. And many men who wish it were different, who would love to be more with their families, who would delight to aid in instructing their little ones, find it, they think, quite impossible so to alter their business--so to cast off pressure and care, as to give due attention to the moral and religious training of their children. But, fathers, might you not do better than you do? Suppose you should make the effort to have _an hour_ each day to aid your wife in giving a right moral direction to your little ones? How you would encourage her! What an impulse would you give to her efforts! Now, how often has she a burden imposed upon her, which she is unable to bear! What uneasiness and worry--what care and trouble are caused her, by having, in this matter of training the children, to go on single-handed! whereas, were your parental authority added to her maternal tenderness, your children would prove the joy of your hearts and the comfort of your declining years. But as you manage--or rather as you neglect to manage them, a hundred chances to one if they do not prove your sorrow, when in years you are not able well to sustain it. Gather a lesson, my friend, from the conduct of David in respect to Absolom. He neglected him--he indulged him, and what was the consequence? The bright, beautiful, gifted Absolom planted thorns in his father's crown,--he attempted to dethrone him,--he was a fratricide,--he would have been a parricide: and what an end! Oh, what an end! Listen to the sorrowful outpourings of a fond, too fond, unfaithful parent: "My son, oh, my son Absolom,--would to God I had died for thee, oh, Absolom, my son, my son!" Take another example, and may it prove a warning to such indulgence and such neglect! Eli had sons, and they grew up, and they walked in forbidden ways, and he restrained them not; yet he was a good man: but |
|