Boer Politics by Yves Guyot
page 101 of 167 (60%)
page 101 of 167 (60%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
7.--_The Franchise is Self-Government._
Confronted with these facts, the Pro-Boer cries: "Ah, but Mr. Krüger was obliged to protect himself. He could not have his burghers swamped by Uitlanders. He was perfectly right." Good. There is the theory that honest dealing is unnecessary in public negotiations; an apology for that system which is in direct contradiction to the maxim of private law that you cannot give and withhold at one and the same time. "But why should the English insist upon obtaining the franchise for Uitlanders?" In order that there should be no more need for the British Government to concern itself in Transvaal affairs, Sir Alfred Milner was right when he said to the State Attorney (despatch of August 15th): "I am sure that the present proposal is made _bonâ fide_ in order to establish the rights of British subjects once for all; and the Government of the South African Republic need not entertain any fear that we should wish to intervene in its internal affairs in future." On August 28th, Mr. Chamberlain speaks the same language; at the same time justly observing, that only a portion of the Englishmen residing in the Transvaal would seek to become naturalised. In point of fact when in February, 1896, the British Government demanded autonomy for the Rand, and on this proposition being refused, demanded |
|