Rudyard Kipling by John Palmer
page 23 of 74 (31%)
page 23 of 74 (31%)
|
Kipling's India is a land where science is mocked, and synthetic
philosophies perish, and mere talk is wiped from the lips. You do not talk of Humanity in India, because in India "you really see humanity--raw, brown, naked humanity--with nothing between it and the blazing sky, and only the used-up, overhandled earth underfoot." Mr Kipling's Indian administrators are practical and simple men, who obey orders and accept the incredible because their position requires them to administer India as though they were never at fault, whereas their experience tells them that, if they are never to be at fault in India, it is wise to be not too original and fatal to be too rigid. _Tods' Amendment_ and _The Conversion of Aurelian McGoggin_ are printed among _Plain Tales from the Hills_. They look forward to a whole series of Anglo-Indian tales which present Mr Kipling's idea of the English in India. Out of his later books we can illustrate a hundred times his conviction that in India the simplest wisdom is the best. But there are two kinds of simplicity. The one kind is illustrated in a tale from _The Day's Work_; it is the right kind of simplicity. In no story of Mr Kipling is the devoted service and practical resourcefulness of the good Civilian so movingly celebrated as in the story of _William the Conqueror_. It is the story of a famine, and of how it was met by the servants of the Indian Government. The administration of famine relief would seem to be a simple thing when the grain has come by rail and only waits to be distributed. But the district served by the little group of English in _William the Conqueror_ was a district which did not understand the food of the North, and, if it could not get the rice which it knew, was ready to starve within reach of bagsful of unfamiliar wheat or rye. The hero of the tale is finally reduced to distributing the Government rations to |
|