Historic Doubts Relative To Napoleon Buonaparte by Richard Whately
page 41 of 60 (68%)
page 41 of 60 (68%)
|
sur les Probabilités_.
That is, the chances for the fact thus attested being true, will be, according to this distinguished calculator, less than one in eight. Very few of the common newspaper-stories, however, relating to foreign countries, could be traced, if the matter were carefully investigated, up to an actual eye-witness, even through twenty intermediate witnesses; and many of the steps of our ladder, would, I fear, prove but rotten; few of the reporters would deserve to have _one in ten_ fixed as the proportion of their false accounts. [7] "I did not mention the difficulty of detecting a falsehood in any private or even public history, at the time and place where it is said to happen; much more where the scene is removed to ever so small a distance.... But the matter never comes to any issue, if trusted to the common method of altercation and debate and flying rumours."â_Hume's Essay on Miracles_, p. 195, 12mo; pp. 200, 201, 8vo, 1767; p. 127, 8vo, 1817. [8] See the third Postscript appended to this edition. [9] "We entertain a suspicion concerning any matter of fact, when the witnesses _contradict_ each other; when they are of a _suspicious_ character; when they have an _interest_ in what they affirm."â_Hume's Essay on Miracles_, p. 172, 12mo; p. 176, 8vo, 1767; p. 113, 8vo. 1817. [10] "That testimony itself derives all its force from experience, seems very certain.... The first author, we believe, who stated fairly the connexion between the evidence of testimony and the evidence of |
|