The Audacious War by Clarence W. Barron
page 106 of 146 (72%)
page 106 of 146 (72%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
lived on the land. Now, forty-four years later, she is fighting the
whole world, but only 30 per cent of her people live by the fruit of the soil. That is the simple answer as to why Germany, a country besieged, cannot win against the world. Germany has no sea-expansive ability, no foreign credit, no international reserves to carry out an offensive warfare. Her only possibility of success lay in a sudden and decisive march over the rich territory of France, the possession of Paris, and a huge indemnity tax levy as in 1871. The rest might have been easy. Hence the supreme military necessity for a quick drive through Belgium, the only open road to Paris. The size of the crime in Belgium has shown the supreme financial necessity. There was no military necessity for the outrage against the free Belgian people--only the economic necessity. There is nothing left for Germany but a defensive warfare, a warfare now conducted upon foreign soil just over her own borders--the burden upon the enemy, the supply base near at hand. Germany must reduce and conserve her shell-fire. The Krupp works have no ability to turn out daily the number of shells that Germany was exploding, and the United States in its own arsenals could not in a year make a week's supply of shells at the rate at which they were being exploded from Switzerland to the English Channel. Greater than progress in the arts of peace is progress in the art of war. We have read in the American papers of a most wonderful new French shell that in bursting paralyzes and destroys life so instantly |
|


