Death—and After? by Annie Wood Besant
page 67 of 93 (72%)
page 67 of 93 (72%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
which the graduates of Esoteric Science regard such a
question. Does the last penalty of the law mean the highest honour of the peerage? Is a wooden spoon the emblem of the most illustrious pre-eminence in learning? Such questions as these but faintly symbolise the extravagance of the question whether Nirvâna is held by Buddhism to be equivalent to annihilation.[41] So we learn from the _Secret Doctrine_ that the Nirvânî returns to cosmic activity in a new cycle of manifestation, and that _The thread of radiance which is imperishable and dissolves only in Nirvâna, re-emerges from it in its integrity on the day when the Great Law calls all things back into action._[42] COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN THE EARTH AND OTHER SPHERES. We are now in position to discriminate between the various kinds of communication possible between those whom we foolishly divide into "dead" and "living," as though the body were the man, or the man could die. "Communications between the embodied and the disembodied" would be a more satisfactory phrase. First, let us put aside as unsuitable the word Spirit: Spirit does not communicate with Spirit in any way conceivable by us. That highest principle is not yet manifest in the flesh; it remains the hidden fount of all, the eternal Energy, one of the poles of Being in manifestation. The word is loosely used to denote lofty Intelligences, |
|